| 1st Quadrangular Amistós Team Tournament: Andorra la Vella 2004 |
[ Information || The final group || Statistics ]
[ Basic data | Tournament review ]
| 1st Quadrangular Amistós Team Tournament (see all-time tournament summary) |
|
| Dates: | 29th - 30th May 2004 |
| City: | Andorra la Vella (Andorra) |
| Venue: | Hotel Màgic Andorra |
| Tournament Director: | |
| Chief Arbiter: | IA Juan Escribano and IA Agustín Santos Etxepare (ESP) |
| Teams participating: | 4 (from 3 countries) |
| Players participating: | 25 (incl. 3 GMs, 4 IMs and 6 FMs) |
| Games played: | 36 |
| Competition format: | Round Robin |
| Final order decided by: | 1. Game points |
| Time control: | 90 minutes per game + 30 sec. increment per move starting from move 1 |
| Website: | 1er. Cuadrangular Amistosos ANDBANC (cached) |
| PGN game file: | 04quadr.pgn |
|
by Gerardo Fernández Hdez (bd 5 of Euskadi team) The four-nation tournament was played during the last weekend of May 2004 in Andorra la Valle in the Pyrenees. The event was sponsored by the Andorran private bank ANDBANK. First round:
Black still has the advantage, but Black might have found himself in danger of losing, had only White managed to sacrifice the Knight for the 'c' file pawn and then win the 'h' file pawn. Covering the King with the Knight is a very attractive idea, but during the game, under time pressure, I figured that after 50 ... Nc7 51. Ne8 Rd7 52. Rxc7 Rxc7 53. Nxc7 Kxc7 54. Kd3 the white King captures the pawn (+-). In the game analysis Nicola Lococo found that Black should rather play 53...c2! and not capture the Knight and the pawn gets promoted. Also after 52. Nxc7 Kb7! Black wins. But chess is very complicated and this analysis is wrong too, because White may play the "spite" move 51. Ke3! winning a tempo necessary to catch the pawn: 51... Rd1 52. Ne8 Td7 53. Rxc7 Rxc7 54. Nxc7 Kxc7+- (now required because the white King takes the pawn) 55. g4! The idea is to play 56. h5 and the black King cannot take the e5 pawn because of the threat of a winning g4-g5 breakthrough. Too bad that Olaizola, after conducting an excellent winning attack, failed to find the proper finish. In the diagram position, under time pressure, he chose the wrong piece to give the check: 28. Ra8+? Rc7-+. Instead, 28. Qa8+ would win for White.
In the match between Andorra and Catalonia, the latter scored an identical result to ours: 2 to 4. The most significant mistake was that made by the Andorran Marc Simonet in his game vs GM Jordi Magema (white).
The not so obvious 33... Rxd3! would leave black with two Rooks and a piece against the Queen, which would change the result of the match. After the first round Catalonia and Euskadi were joint leaders. Second round:
Patxi has just played 15... Nf5?? and the Andorran defended the pawn playing 16. N3e2??, being unaware that the simple 16. Qxf5 wins a piece. The lady is untouchable because of 16... Qxf5 17. Bxd6 Kg8 18. Re8# In the other match Catalonia defeated Luxembourg by 4½ to 1½, the biggest margin throughout the tournament. After two rounds we are second, Catalonia are safe leaders. Third round: We were also waiting for the result of the other match, because we were going shoulder to shoulder with Andorra and we wanted to finish ahead of them, but their 4-2 vs Luxembourg relegated us to the third place. In brief, our performance as a whole met the expectations. As far as individual results are concerned, Patxi Gallego had to "dance with the worst" and took two draws with the two strongest players of the tournament. Santi González scored two points, a valuable result not only because he was just sick while playing, but because he beat a 2500. Iñigo Argandoña played well too, with 2 points scored and yet another 2500 scalp in his cabinet. Ivan Muñoz scored a good 2½/3 and gained many Elo points in this very short tournament. I got 50% of the points and Luis Olaizola was simply off form. Finally, a curiosity, had it been a 4-board event, like the Olympiad, we would have won: Basque Country 7½, Catalonia and Andorra 6½, Luxembourg 3½.
|